
The GOOD
Coupled with the impressive visuals, is the audio chatter between your fellow Tier One operators, not only is the chatter genuine, it is also your orders, no pop-up objectives, so I was forced to listen closely to my eam leader while taking incoming. Included in the chatter was your teammates' tearing you down when didn't make a shot and I often felt bad when I felt like I let them down! I would reworked missions to hear positives about my skill-set. I found the night missions in the mud villages the most dyamic, while waiting in the shadows, listening to Taliban speak in Pashtun, then striking and if you fucked up, then the whole mission ends normally ends in your death. Crazy.
The BAD
Another issue was that most of the faces of the male characters and enemies in MOH look like the love-child of David Duchovny and Jake Gyllenhaal that just went to a Cure concert (see above)! The melee function of MOH is more than the slash of WM2, but I wanted more, like the context sensitive melee of HALO: Reach. If you are on-line gamer, and who isn't these days, the lack of players online in the lobbies ruins the online pay. There was a night when I was playing online, and there were two of us in a lobby. Two. Never seen that in a COD or HALO game!
With the popularity of military shooters coupled with on-line games, campaigns have taken a backseat to the multiplayer. This is directly seen in the all-too-short campaign of MOH. This is the only real ugly element of MOH. If you are good at military campaign, you can beat the single player game in about six hours. To be honest, it pissed me off. I wanted more of the campaign. I paid for more, and I wanted to experience more of fighting A-Stan as a TIER-ONE operator. After one play through, I engaged in another, and founded the experience the same...and not in a good way. Unlike with games like HALO, the enemies were in the same spot and acted the same. Disappointing.
Medal of Honor vs. COD: MW2
Since both of these games switch from killing Nazis to killing evil-doers, and both of these games take place in current reality of the world...they are often compared, but they are very different. The first time you play the campaign of MW2 is a one of those rare experiences in gaming, and the rush is like a drug. But, it doesn't last (it never does), the more you play MW2, the more the rush decreases, and the more the story doesn't make any logically sense. While MOH story is much more realistic and rooted in actually SOF operations in A-Stan. However, MW2 has MOH beat in characters that are memoriable, like Ghost and Soap... Modern Warfare 2 is also a highly polished game with few mistakes, while MOH suffers from some issues that should have been allowed in a game of such caliber. Simply put, MW2 is like pouring gas on a open flame, while MOH is a low strady burn...I personally enjoyed the campaign of MOH more than MW2, seeing Afghanistan, fighting in the brutal terrain, driving an ATV, and flying in an Apache while dealing death to the Taliban is one hell of an experience and I understood the plot.
Who is that Bearded Special Forces Soldier?
It seems that the 'Dusty' character from MOH (see right) is based on an American Special Forces Operator that was seen in A-Stan around August of 2002 (see left), and is most likely a Green Beret. The images of this 'Cowboy' are some of the most of the iconic of the war, and it seems logical that EA and Danger Close would use him as a model, and if the rumors are true, than Mr.Cowboy maybe one of the 'SOF advisors' for the game.
Here is the Link:
Here is the Link:
Should you buy Medal of Honor?
If you are in the mood for a good solid military shooter based on real events and places, than this a good choice, just don't pay for it new or the online play, because mark my words, the online play will die quickly. Medal of Honor is still one of the best experiences in shooters that should be undertaking...it is a good six hours of fun in the mountains hunting evildoers!
nice...... i was actually playing both of them, but MoH was more realistic and belivable than MW series...
ReplyDeleteFuture War Stories: Fws Game Review: Medal Of Honor (2010) >>>>> Download Now
Delete>>>>> Download Full
Future War Stories: Fws Game Review: Medal Of Honor (2010) >>>>> Download LINK
>>>>> Download Now
Future War Stories: Fws Game Review: Medal Of Honor (2010) >>>>> Download Full
>>>>> Download LINK TB
Dating for everyone is here: ❤❤❤ Link 1 ❤❤❤
DeleteDirect sexchat: ❤❤❤ Link 2 ❤❤❤
Vx..
The COD:MW sega, while kewl and bloody, is much more of a "video game" when compared to MOH, especially given that Tier-One operators helped them. My hope is that Danger Close doesn't ruin it or make more like COD. I cannot wait to play more!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment!
greetings, and heil hitler!
ReplyDeletei just read this entire page of blog entry's, and enjoyed it. i'm glad you pointed out the lack of tactical choices involved with limited size game environments. i hate games like bf3, that have 'out zones' etc. if you like a game which has NO out zones, try joint operations typhoon rising.
the graphics could be a little better, since i am not a pilot and my time in combat was Loas, yes SF did go there. I found it hard to finish the AC-130 gunship mission, for the cost the solo player is way to short, loved modern warefare 2
ReplyDeleteI love the Modern Warfare series as well, but found that the elite SOF units featured in both game series are much more realistic in the MOH games, even the very fatally flawed Warfighter.
ReplyDeleteThanks for reading and commenting!
good game i love the all around story based game this game is for solo playing I do not like the multy player
ReplyDeleteFuture War Stories: Fws Game Review: Medal Of Honor (2010) >>>>> Download Now
ReplyDelete>>>>> Download Full
Future War Stories: Fws Game Review: Medal Of Honor (2010) >>>>> Download LINK
>>>>> Download Now
Future War Stories: Fws Game Review: Medal Of Honor (2010) >>>>> Download Full
>>>>> Download LINK
Dating for everyone is here: ❤❤❤ Link 1 ❤❤❤
ReplyDeleteDirect sexchat: ❤❤❤ Link 2 ❤❤❤
kR. .