A Blog Devoted to Exploring and Explaining the World of Military Science Fiction.
31 December 2013
FWS News: Goodbye Ben and Thank You
On December 29 in New York City, Benjamin Curtis died from his fight with cancer. He was 35. Future War Stories has supported him and his work in School of Seven Bells during his time of illness, and it was hoped that 2014 would mark the return of Ben to the stage and the end of his bloodborne cancer. Sadly, that did not happen. I am saddened beyond simple words at the loss of Ben from our world. This planet is darker without him and his gifts. He was a great human being and creator. His death is just further proof that the world is an unfair place. Untalented hacks like Kanye West, Justin Bieber, and One Direction continue to turn out music, but the great light of music that Ben was has been taken from us way too early. The world is not a fair place, and it is times like this that I remind myself of my faith in nothing...which helps. To all of those that Benjamin Curtis loved and considered family and friends, my deepest sorrow and condolences for your loss and the loss to all of us. Ben will be missed, and I will always hold a place in my heart for him and his work with School of Seven Bells. Thank you, Ben, and peace be with you where ever you are...
26 December 2013
FWS News Flash: More Faithful STARSHIP TROOPERS Remake?!
Even while FWS is on holiday in New Mexico, the world of Military Sci-Fi didn't slow down...good FWS friend Derek Restivo FB'ed me on the breaking story about the remake of Starship Troopers and I had to break out the iPad. It seems that the remake SST writer, Zack Stentz reported during a Twitter exchange with film blogger Scott Weinberg that the new film will be closer to the original 1959 novel, and it seems that 1997 film style will be completely abandoned. To quote Zack "An Officer & an Gentleman with Power Armor." Very cool and if the SFX is solid with the powered armor and the bugs, we could have a real winner here...finally. The new film's producer is Neal Moritz, who worked on Battle: Los Angeles, could translate to some serious battlescenes. I am personally hoping for a opening similar to the novel, with the raid on the Skinny homeworld...complete with atomic grenades. So, when are to expect this remake SST? Around 2016 according to them. Right now, the script is still being written, and no stars are casting, and I don't know if a director as been settled on. Also on this article was the reaction of director Paul Verhoeven, who was less than impressed with the effort to bring a different vision to the battered world of SST.
I personally think that he knows if the new film is closer to the novel without the oddness of his 1997 flick, it would relegate his SST film out of importance in the realm of science fiction...and that most of his films have been or will be remade. That aside, Starship Troopers is the founding classic of military science fiction, and deserves a work that will take the effective elements of the original 1959 story and springboard that to an epic war film set in the future. One of the major questions I have for the upcoming film is if the politics will remain? The 1997 film handled the society of the Federation will an "interesting" take, and with the tone of the film, it worked. The people working on the remake should pay attention to that....because if you bog down the new 2016 film with the heavy-handed iron politics of the novel, than this future war picture will suffer greater. I do think that one casting decision that should be retained from the 1997 film, Michael Ironside...that man is a badass, and worked well in the film. Damn...this is a long news flash blogpost...why does SST bring out the wordiness in me? Alright...back to GHOSTS.
I personally think that he knows if the new film is closer to the novel without the oddness of his 1997 flick, it would relegate his SST film out of importance in the realm of science fiction...and that most of his films have been or will be remade. That aside, Starship Troopers is the founding classic of military science fiction, and deserves a work that will take the effective elements of the original 1959 story and springboard that to an epic war film set in the future. One of the major questions I have for the upcoming film is if the politics will remain? The 1997 film handled the society of the Federation will an "interesting" take, and with the tone of the film, it worked. The people working on the remake should pay attention to that....because if you bog down the new 2016 film with the heavy-handed iron politics of the novel, than this future war picture will suffer greater. I do think that one casting decision that should be retained from the 1997 film, Michael Ironside...that man is a badass, and worked well in the film. Damn...this is a long news flash blogpost...why does SST bring out the wordiness in me? Alright...back to GHOSTS.
21 December 2013
Happy Holidays 2013!
Happy Holidays to all! I hope that everyone as a happy holiday season with lots of presents, family, food, and Egg-Nog! I will be spending the Xmas holiday similar to last year, breaking in a new Call of Duty game...GHOSTS. Also, since it is that holiday time again, it is also time as well for the annual FWS holiday blogpost. During these blogposts, I like to take the time to discuss business around the FWS offices, some personal items, and the past and future of FWS. Let me just say that 2013 has been the biggest year in FWS history. Traffic, comments, and requests are all up to record levels. That is all due to all of you that read, comment, tweet, shared, and google + FWS blogposts. Seriously, thank you very much to everyone for your support and comments this year and in the years to come! What can you expect from FWS in 2014? Nothing too radical. There will be no major changes to the look or format of FWS. The biggest news for FWS in 2014 is the joint web-comic project Regicide between FWS and Derek Restivo of Xenomorphosis.com that should be out in January. Below is a teaser of what you can expect from the talent of Derek...and if you are in need of an illustrator or artist, than get in contact with him. Believe me, you will not be disappointed! In other news, I recently received a number of books to review, and in turn, there more book reviews on the blog in 2014. There will a new blog-series called Our Enemies, which will breakdown the common types enemies of mankind seen in science fiction. Our first entry in this new series will be exploring and explaining killer space tigers. Also, I've been updating some of the older FWS blogposts, reformatting them and updating these older blogposts to the standards of FWS today. This started when I reviewed a comment on the 2011 Gauss Gun blogpost recently and was horrified by the sight of how FWS used to look and read. Ugh. In personal news, I am submitting the book to another publisher, and I beginning work on another MSF novel. Even though this novel was finished in 2010, it has been rewritten several times, and now it is time number five. It is my hope that next year will find me being published. Again, Happy Holidays, drink some Egg-Nog, and thank you for everything this year. FWS will return after the New Year...
17 December 2013
Top Ten: Now For Something Completely Different....My Favorite Musicians
For those that read this blog, and know me in the real world, are aware that I am seriously into music, and always have been. While I cannot play a single lick of anything or sing, music is a key component of my life and writing. FWS is not a personal blog about my life, but with Xmas coming up, and needing a break to began work on another novel, I decided to make a easy blogpost to cast some light on me. If you don't care about me and just interested in military sci-fi, than that is cool, that is the bread-and-butter of FWS, and FWS is not going to become an personal blog....I hate when that happens! My musical tastes have changed over the years. When I was in elementary school, I listened to top-40...which was awesome mid-1980's pop music...yes, our pop music was better than today's, just a simple fact. During middle school, I was obsessed by heavy metal/Punk and guitar-centered rock, like Metallica, Van Halen, Motorhead, Megadeath, Black Sabbath, the Sex Pistols, Jeff Beck, Steve Vai, and Yngwie Malmsteen. Then in high school, while everyone was listening to Garth fucking Brooks, Nirvana (I liked Hole more than Nirvana), and Pearl Jam, I was tuning into Riot Grrrl and classic rock, like Led Zeppelin and the Doors. Today, I'm more into electronic-driven music, like Daft Punk, Deadmau5, Broken Bells, Kavinsky, some bands mentioned below. This blogpost was inspirited by Bennett the Sage's own top ten music video. These are in order of preference.
Honorable Mention: SHERYL CROW
At first, Sheryl Crow was nothing more than the cute girl that was singing a song with my name in it when I was a senior in high school. Honestly, I thought she was a flash in the pain. My opinion changed in 1996 with the released of her second, darker album. 1996 was a complex and hard year for me personally, and I was in pain. To heal those wounds, I listened to this album and turned to things I shouldn't have. To this day, her second and third album rank as some of my favorites, and I can be transported back to those strange days with her music. When my wife was pregnant, we saw her, Lisa Loeb (meow!), Luscious Jackson, and Sarah Mclachian during Lilith Fair, and it seemed that life had come full circle. I guess music can save you...
10. JOHANN SEBASTIAN BACH
Surprised? JS Bach has always been my point-of-reference for classic music, and been with me during the writing of books, college papers, and times when I needed to relax. His Brandenburg Concertos are a favorite of mine, and I've written many of FWS blogposts to that CD, especially the Powered Armored blogpost for a few months ago. To me, Bach maybe the language of the divine and the soul. Simply put, Bach rocks!
9. QUEEN
When Freddie Mercury died in 1991, I wore black for a week, and mourned the loss of this unique soul to the world and all of mankind. In simplest terms, I fucking love QUEEN! Unlike many of my generation, I got into Queen prior to Wayne's World, via soundtrack the Flash Gordon, but enjoyed that they got popular again with a new generation due to their iconic song. When you examine rock bands, Queen is certainly one of the archetypes in both music and performance. I also like that Queen had a sense of humor, because life is just a fucking downer most of the time, and Queen allowed me to laugh and cry. For me, the talent and energy of Queen can be summed up with the song "39". Long May Queen Reign!
8. MOBY
Back in 1999, I was hooked the Chemical Brothers and Sleater-Kinney, and then I heard about this album that was making all of the best lists of that year. That album was Play by Moby, and it wasn't until I heard "Porcelain" that I understood why. By Xmas of 1999, my mother bought me the double disc of Play, and I wrote the vast majority of my early books to this album, and have come to respect Moby as a thinker and a musician. Throughout the years, I have bought most of Moby's music since Play, and I enjoy it, especially portions of Hotel and Last Night, but lately work his work seems to be stuck in a pattern...still Moby as the power to move me.
7. LADYTRON
While exploring some artists similar to Goldfrapp, I discovered the power and magic of the European electro-crash band Ladytron! Channeling different elements of 1980's synthpop, modern electroncia, haunting voices, and solid music sensibility, Ladytron rapidly became one of my favorite bands, and their 2002 release Light and Magic is damn near prefect. Their music is made with such skill and soul, that the label of cold computerized music is blown away.Their music is both hard beats coupled with also soft emotional tones. Truly magically.
6. JOHN LEE HOOKER
When you look up "bad mother fucker" online, it should just show pictures of Samuel L. Jackson and this man, John Lee Hooker. When I was small, watching the Blues Brother movie, I was mesmerized by Hooker singing "Boom Boom" on the street, and since then, I've been a fan of this Chicago Blues Legend. Maybe being born in Mississippi helps my love of Delta Blues/Chicago Blues music? You have not lived until you've listened to this man who's bad like Jesse James.
5. The DANDY WARHOLS
Originally founded with the objective to have "music for their friends to drink to", Oregon's Dandy Warhols have become a creative force in power-pop and neo-psychedelia music, and one of the better pure rock bands in the United States. Honestly, the Dandy Warhols are just a great jamming rock band with a great sense of humor and art that rocks out, and they would be a fun band to party with. Out of all of their releases, their 1997 release ...and the Dandy Warhols Come Down is the best. However, their take on Gordon Footlights The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald is worth the listen, and along with their Monkey House release.
4. The DOORS
The vast majority of people are going to drift towards the Doors because of Jim Morrison and his aura, and while he is a major gravitational force of the music, he was also backed up by some incredible talent. For me, Jim Morrison would still be sleeping on a roof if it were not for Ray Manzarek, Robby Krieger, and the jazzy backbeats of John Densmore. To this day, I enjoy their music, but not their mega-hits that get repeated over and over, it is songs like "Gloria", "When the Music is Over", and "Texas Radio" that get me. The Doors were a unique experience that could have only come out of the 1960's, and are very lucky that the tension of those times give birth to the dark wisdom of The Doors. If you are interested in the history of The Doors, read John Densmore's book.
3. SLEATER-KINNEY
Intense double guitar work, two vocalists with power and intelligence that sing about left politics, and the power of Janet Weiss on drums all add up to one of the best bands in American music recently....Sleater-Kinney! I discovered S-K in a Spin article, and decided to give them a try while a local music store on Oakland and Lemmon in Dallas around 1999. the cute bespectacled girl working the shop was impressed I was asking for S-K and directed me towards their 1997 release "Dig Me Out"...after popping into the Civic...mind was blown! S-K was a revelation and give many years of happiness and ass-kicking rock-n-roll. However, 2005 the party was over, and Sleater-Kinney split up. Today, two of the three members are in Wild Flag (also very cool band) and Corin Tucker is in the Corin Tucker Band. This band still has the power to make me move my ass in my driver's seat!
2. LED-ZEPPELIN
What can little old me say about the greatest rock band of all time? Not much that hasn't been said before. By far, Led-Zeppelin is the gods of rock that all modern music today and tomorrow must pay homage to. For me, Led-Zeppelin was a fusion of Delta Blues and talent with some J.R.R. Tolkien thrown in for good measure. I got into Led-Zeppelin hard around 1992, and most likely wore one of their t-shirts every week for years. There are just no words to accurately description the power, impact, and legacy of this one English band. Out of all Led-Zeppelin's song catalog, I love "Traveling Riverside Blues" and "Gallows Pole", and my favorite album of theirs is "III". The world is a better place because of them.
1. The SCHOOL OF SEVEN BELLS
Anyone that knows me or works with me, or even visits FWS, knows I fucking love School of Seven Bells (SVIIB). Since the first moment I listened to them in 2008, there is just something about their music and words that fits so organically into my soul. While it is hard to define their music, others have tried. Labels like Shoe Gaze, Dream Pop, and even some comparisons to My Bloody Valentine, Section 25, or the Cocteau Twins. Despite the labels, School of Seven Bells brings the sound, and continues to amaze with each released. I first heard SVIIB when I was picking my daughter from school while listening to NPR's "The World" in 2008.
During the music portion of the segment, they profiled SVIIB's first release "Alpinism", and within 15 seconds I was hooked. We drove to the nearest Best Buy and the disc didn't leave my car for three months. Every release, review, and photo of SVIIB became something I needed to experience, because not only is the music incredible, but Ally and Ben are interesting as well. If you have not checked out this band, please do, because there is some amazing stuff being made in Brooklyn. There is such light in all that they do. Seriously, SVIIB is one of the best bands in America or even the world today.
11 December 2013
FWS News Flash: Edge of Tomorrow Trailer!
Here we go! Time to see this thing in motion! Some of the locations were not in the Japanese novel, but I will not to pass judgement until March. Honestly, I cannot for this one!
10 December 2013
FWS News Flash: New Edge of Tomorrow Combat Pictures!
Here is the rest of the pictures:
08 December 2013
FWS Topics: Ten Years Ago...Looking Back At The BSG Miniseries
Where does the frakking time go? It has been ten year since the Sci-Fi Channel aired the first part of the Ronald D. Moore/David Eick Battlestar Galactica miniseries. Ten years. Given the importance of BSG in the realm of military science fiction, I thought we would look back on one of the greatest events for TV science fiction as a whole. Prior to the 2003 miniseries, BSG was a bad state of affairs. FOX and USA were going to continue the story of the original 1978 series, by picking up years after the original run of the series, and the dogshit Galactica:1980 was going to be ignored...thankfully. All of this was going to headed up by director Bryan Singer. Around the same time, Richard Hatch was shopping around his own proposed series trailer that he funded himself, called Galactica: the Second Coming. The attempted Bryan Singer BSG project was delayed after September 11th, and Singer had to drop out per prior commitments, and the studio ignored Hatch's proposal. It seemed that the attempt to bring this old property back to life was dead. It seemed that USA/NBC moved quickly when Moore and Eick proposed their spin on the old themes and events of BSG.
Fear of Change
Galacticia fans were a small, but diehard legion that kept hope alive that one sweet day, the gods of television would see the errors of their ways, and put BSG back on the air...and not more shit like Galactica: 1980. After that dogshit series failed, the property went into hibernation. While you could still catch BSG repeating on the old Sci-Fi Channel, the series began to look more and more cheesy as time went on, especially when Space: Above and Beyond hit the airwaves in 1995. Fans of the old series were relieved when Bryan Singer decided to continue to the original Larson concept, much to the rejoice of the series fans. But that project died, and once again, fans were left with nothing. When Moore and Eick got the green-light, there were waves of concern among the community of old-school BSG fans due to the amount of changes that were undertaken and with the ties that RDM had with Trek. Starbuck being a woman created a major stir, along with the hard-edge, more realistic tone. I can remember rumors of Cylons being built by humans, and there would be no more laser blasters and somehow BLADE RUNNER was going to be added to the mix. It was also worrisome to fans that Moore and Eick had been quoted as saying that they were going to strip away the 1970's and Star Wars veneer.
The majority of fans of the original series were put off by these changes, and most of them wanted a return to the concept and feel of that 1970's sci-fi failure. For some of us that do not remember the original 1970's Battlestar Galactica, we should talk about that as well. Back in the late 1970's, Star Wars was the juggernaut of the box-office, and had changed science fiction as well as society, and everyone wanted to make some money off of this trend. BSG was sold to ABC by Glen A. Larson as a series of TV movies, and would capitalize on the trends of Star Wars, Chariots of the Gods, and fears over greater computerization. The series would die after one season mainly to the expense of the show and wandering focus of the show, and stiff competition in their time slot. To me, the original series never lived up to the promise of the story and the sets. While some of the acting was good, and there was a kernel of good science fiction there, most of the series was half-baked and a product of its time.
Tapping into American History...
Rewatching the 2003 miniseries, and being a history major, you notice that Moore and Eick tapped into certain events in American history that allow for those in-tune to see the connection. For those not in-tune, that is still a power image of nuclear mushroom clouds, people running away from the danger, the president being sworn in on a plane, leaving people behind. For me, the miniseries brought up feelings of September 11th, and made the situation with the colonies more realistic and current that an event that happened 150,000 years ago. This was one of the beauties of the miniseries, raw emotional punch that so lacking from the Saga of a Star World.
Watching Both Miniseries Today
For this blogpost, I decided to watch Saga of a Star World and 2003 miniseries The new BSG became a sea change to science fiction, especially military sci-fi. It was frequent called the "best show on TV", and the ending is still discussed today. I was continuly impressed by the 2003 miniseries, the complexity, the historical references, the levels of emotion, and the care of design and story. Then I watched the 1978 TV movie and....well....While it is true that any work is a product of their time, the original BSG suffers greatly from this. The attack on the colonies is lame and underwhelming. The entire focus of the story if completely off, and while the acting is good, there is nothing for them to do. While the 2003 miniseries is most superior in every way to the 1978 variation, I did miss the Colonial Warriors concept and the badass original score. Also, because I've seen the entire series now twice, I had to admit that the fourth season of BSG was weak, especially the whole Baltar-being-a-messiah thing, I like the end of the series. I know that some people have an issue with the disappearance of Starbuck, or that the remains of the 12 Colonies of Kobol bend with us, to form an hybrid species. In some ways, despite all of formal training in history and that I am godless, I would like the end of BSG to true.
That some part of all of our DNA comes from people from the 12 Colonies, and they gave us some noble and true. After all, wouldn't it be interesting if portions of the foundation of our civilization was from our there? Could have there been brothers and sisters of man, battling to survive among the stars, thousands of years before the foundations of cities, the taming of fire, and religion? Could we be them? Wouldn't that be cool?
Fear of Change
Galacticia fans were a small, but diehard legion that kept hope alive that one sweet day, the gods of television would see the errors of their ways, and put BSG back on the air...and not more shit like Galactica: 1980. After that dogshit series failed, the property went into hibernation. While you could still catch BSG repeating on the old Sci-Fi Channel, the series began to look more and more cheesy as time went on, especially when Space: Above and Beyond hit the airwaves in 1995. Fans of the old series were relieved when Bryan Singer decided to continue to the original Larson concept, much to the rejoice of the series fans. But that project died, and once again, fans were left with nothing. When Moore and Eick got the green-light, there were waves of concern among the community of old-school BSG fans due to the amount of changes that were undertaken and with the ties that RDM had with Trek. Starbuck being a woman created a major stir, along with the hard-edge, more realistic tone. I can remember rumors of Cylons being built by humans, and there would be no more laser blasters and somehow BLADE RUNNER was going to be added to the mix. It was also worrisome to fans that Moore and Eick had been quoted as saying that they were going to strip away the 1970's and Star Wars veneer.
The majority of fans of the original series were put off by these changes, and most of them wanted a return to the concept and feel of that 1970's sci-fi failure. For some of us that do not remember the original 1970's Battlestar Galactica, we should talk about that as well. Back in the late 1970's, Star Wars was the juggernaut of the box-office, and had changed science fiction as well as society, and everyone wanted to make some money off of this trend. BSG was sold to ABC by Glen A. Larson as a series of TV movies, and would capitalize on the trends of Star Wars, Chariots of the Gods, and fears over greater computerization. The series would die after one season mainly to the expense of the show and wandering focus of the show, and stiff competition in their time slot. To me, the original series never lived up to the promise of the story and the sets. While some of the acting was good, and there was a kernel of good science fiction there, most of the series was half-baked and a product of its time.
Tapping into American History...
Rewatching the 2003 miniseries, and being a history major, you notice that Moore and Eick tapped into certain events in American history that allow for those in-tune to see the connection. For those not in-tune, that is still a power image of nuclear mushroom clouds, people running away from the danger, the president being sworn in on a plane, leaving people behind. For me, the miniseries brought up feelings of September 11th, and made the situation with the colonies more realistic and current that an event that happened 150,000 years ago. This was one of the beauties of the miniseries, raw emotional punch that so lacking from the Saga of a Star World.
Watching Both Miniseries Today
For this blogpost, I decided to watch Saga of a Star World and 2003 miniseries The new BSG became a sea change to science fiction, especially military sci-fi. It was frequent called the "best show on TV", and the ending is still discussed today. I was continuly impressed by the 2003 miniseries, the complexity, the historical references, the levels of emotion, and the care of design and story. Then I watched the 1978 TV movie and....well....While it is true that any work is a product of their time, the original BSG suffers greatly from this. The attack on the colonies is lame and underwhelming. The entire focus of the story if completely off, and while the acting is good, there is nothing for them to do. While the 2003 miniseries is most superior in every way to the 1978 variation, I did miss the Colonial Warriors concept and the badass original score. Also, because I've seen the entire series now twice, I had to admit that the fourth season of BSG was weak, especially the whole Baltar-being-a-messiah thing, I like the end of the series. I know that some people have an issue with the disappearance of Starbuck, or that the remains of the 12 Colonies of Kobol bend with us, to form an hybrid species. In some ways, despite all of formal training in history and that I am godless, I would like the end of BSG to true.
That some part of all of our DNA comes from people from the 12 Colonies, and they gave us some noble and true. After all, wouldn't it be interesting if portions of the foundation of our civilization was from our there? Could have there been brothers and sisters of man, battling to survive among the stars, thousands of years before the foundations of cities, the taming of fire, and religion? Could we be them? Wouldn't that be cool?
01 December 2013
Ships of the Line: Heavy Cruisers
The term "cruiser" has been around since the 17th century, and became a key ship class in the war at sea during the Second World War. In the realm of science fiction, the heavy cruiser is one of the most popular classification of warships. This includes the most iconic and recognized fictional spaceships of all time, the NCC-1701 USS Enterprise. However, contrary to the vision presented in science fiction, the naval heavy cruiser had a brief operational life around the time of World War II, and ended shortly after. FWS will once again be exploring the fictional and real world heavy cruiser in nauseating detail. Also, be warned...FWS will be covering cruisers for the next several Ships of the Line blogposts. From light/medium Cruisers to the Missile Cruisers.
What is an Heavy Cruiser?
The term "cruiser" comes from the Dutch word "Kruiser" and means "something that crosses". In naval terminology, a cruiser (of various "weights") are the smallest naval warships capably of independent operations. Around the turn of the last century, the term "armored cruiser" is also used to describe similar vessels to the heavy cruiser and the niche that the heavy cruiser occupied was a warship displacing 10,000 tons, and fitted with rapid-fire 8-inch (203mm) guns that could operate over long distances. The difference between a "light" cruiser verse a "heavy" cruiser is often the weight displaced, but not always. Another method of separating various cruiser is based the size of their cannons. The 2nd World War light cruiser fires a 6 inch shell, while the heavy cruiser fires the 8 inch shell.
The Combat Role of the Naval Heavy Cruiser
In some ways, the cruiser has been a warship that as charged through the years to the conditions and technology of naval warfare. During the interim-years between WWI and WWII, the heavy cruiser combat role was envisioned as a protector of shipping, fencing off the advances of enemies vessels bend on attack soft targets, like shipping, as seen in World War One. Cruiser were also envisioned as defenders against smaller warships using torpedoes. With the naval restriction treaty, some believed that the heavy cruiser classification was a loophole, making them more or less battlecruiser, just not in name, but with limited gun size. The Imperial Japanese navy had envisioned heavy cruiser being used for night naval engagements during the 1930's, and to pound enemy vessels with torpedoes and cannon fire.
In the post-WWII era, naval warfare shifted to carriers, submarines, and missiles and away from battleships and other smaller warship classes. However, during the Korean War and Vietnam, cruisers and the few battleships left were used for shore bombardment and artillery support. Even today, the US Marine Corps, maintains that the US Navy must have a vessel and weapon platform for shore bombardment to allow for amphibious assault operations. In the 21st century, the few cruiser classes in service are guide missile cruisers.
The History of the Heavy Cruiser
In the 17th century, as naval warfare was increasing in important of determined the outcome of international wars, the Dutch developed a term for a long-range warship, the "Kruiser". These vessels were mostly in service overseas in foreign and colonial ports. These were seen as a less expensive and critical than the ships of the line. During the age of metal hulled vessels that were powered by motors and not wind, the cruiser became the vessels that projected power to foreign ports and lands. One of the more common type of 18th century warships, the Frigate, was a type of cruiser. In 1874, the first of the armored steam cruiser was launched by the Russians, that was still complete with a full set of sails.
These sails that still were placed on the armored cruiser were allowing for extended range beyond coal stations. These armored cruisers were key in the Japanese victory during the 1905 battle of Tsushima against the Imperial Russian navy. During World War One, these armored cruisers could steam at greater speeds than the battleships of the day, and while these faster warships had their role in the large naval engagements, the dreadnought was the king of the high seas during this era. In the British navy, Sea Lord Jackie Fisher cleaned out many of the older cruisers and parred down the Royal Navy, which was a sign of things to come. It was not until the post-WWI era that the term "heavy cruiser" was official used. The beginning of the heavy cruiser began as solution to the international naval limitation Washington Treaty signed by the five major nations involved in the First World War in 1922. This treaty governed over the physical size of the vessel, along with type and size of her main guns, along with the number that a nation could consider. Most of the limitation on construction numbers were applied to capital ships.
The British proposed that instead of limiting numbers of cruisers and destroyers, there was a displacement and cannon limit...10,000 tons and 8 inch guns. Thus, the heavy cruiser class warship was born out of the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922. Between the Washington Treaty and the London Treaty in 1930, there was a debate about the role and size of the heavy cruiser. It was worked out that the light cruiser would field 6 inch guns (155mm). The new limitations on heavy cruisers wounded the pride of the Japanese, due to heavy cruisers being a key element in their naval strategy. However, the British, France, and Italy had ceased production on heavy cruisers. Some nations used the heavy cruiser to runaround the naval treaties, and several classes of heavy cruisers were above the prescribed 10,000 ton limit.
During the dark days of WWII, the heavy cruisers were on submarine hunting and defending duty. Most heavy cruisers spend the war serving in anti-aircraft and anti-submarine roles. Interestingly, most of the Japanese heavy cruisers were not sunk via air or ship engagements, but by submarines. After the war, things changed for navies around the global. With nuclear powered submarines, aricraft carriers, and the Cold War, navies cut down on their ships and classes, and one of the first to be cut down was the heavy cruiser. The last heavy cruiser commissioned in the US Navy was the all-gun cruiser USS Newport News and continued in service until 1975 when she was scrapped in 1993.The world's last surviving heavy cruiser in existence is the USS Salem (CA-139) that was laid down in the last days of World War II, and launched in 1947, and served until 1959 mostly as a training vessel, and made into a museum ship in 1994. Today, the only cruisers still constructed and serving in modern navies, are the guided missile cruiser, like the USN Ticonderoga class.
Why are Heavy Cruisers Obsolete?
After World War II, President Thurman the rise of the aircraft carrier, less relevancy of naval guns in favor of missiles, and the advent of nuclear-powered submarines, caused the major navies of the world parred down their old fleets.The cruiser and the battleship classes were basically eliminated y the 1960's, with Frigates serving as more or less cruisers. The cruisers that were left in service use missiles and advanced sensor systems to protect the aircraft carrier group from incoming threats. They can also strike land targets with their cruise missiles. FWS will covering more on missile cruisers in a later blogpost. At present, there are no heavy cruisers in service with any navy. The only ship that comes close are the surviving members of the Russian Kirov class battlecruiser.
The Heavy Cruiser and Science Fiction
The idea of using naval classification for spaceborne vessels came from the mind of E.E. "Doc" Smith in the 1930's. Prior to this, most of our space heroes and villains did battle in rocket ships that mostly were devoid of any classification. The popularity of applying naval classifications to starships reached new levels with the popularity of spaceship combat games, like the old FASA Star Trek: Starship combat simulator. If you examine the bulk of sci-fi ships seen in movies and TV series, most are classified as "heavy cruisers". This is true from Star Trek to Babylon 5 to the beautiful Andromeda Ascent. Also, consider that the most iconic starship in science fiction is a heavy cruiser, the Enterprise. But, why is this? If the setting of the story is centered around a specific starship, than logic dictates that starship should be flexible for all types of missions and stories. Also, if the story is centered around one ship, the effects team has to pull off the illusion of that ship in space or the show and its future will suffer.
That level of effects costs money. Before the quality level of CGI SFX, all starships seen on the big and small screens were models, and this took time and expensive to craft a convincing spacecraft that didn't look like something out of a Thunderbirds episode!This limited the amount of ships seen, and often these shows relayed on recycling of the prop or even high-quality model kits (like the USS Constellation from "The Doomsday Machine").
The best all around, flexible ship in most navies is the cruiser, and this became the basis for most military sci-fi ships. Sometimes, the ideas about what class a fictional starship should fit into does not originate with the creators of the work, but rather fans and game designers. Consider much of the ships seen in the world of Star Trek care just labelled "starships". Contrary to this tradition, the original series Constitution class was actually referred to as an "heavy cruiser" in the series. In the 1968 episode "Space Seed", the script actually refers to the Enterprise as a member of the heavy cruiser Constitution class. This idea was reinforced by the FASA RPG, which classified much of Starfleet's starships along naval lines. In a split second shot in Star Trek III: the Search for Spock, there is a monitor on the bridge of the Enterprise that classifies the Enterprise as an "heavy cruiser".
This had effect on future sci-fi creators as well, who looked to these iconic heavy cruisers of sci-fi to craft their own. What is interesting is that while heavy cruisers are extremely popular with sci-fi creators, and appear time and time again, some works are devoid of the iconic classification. I was leafing through my collection of technical manuals, and I realized that in the Starblazers/Space Cruiser Yamato space combat system, the Terran fleet has zero heavy cruiser! This is also true of the Zentraedi and REF fleets from ROBOTECH.
The Combat Role of the Sci-Fi Heavy Cruiser
Could There be an Hard Science Heavy Cruiser?
If we examine the role of the heavy cruiser in the naval tradition and in science fiction, they agree that the cruiser is a independent warship capable of long-range missions. Science fiction seems to think that the future of spaceborne combat vessels is heavy cruisers, but is that possible? Any inter-solar system commerce would be a target, and any deep space outposts would also be a target. These types of patrol and protection duties would fall natural to a "cruiser" type warship. Some believe that different classifications of warships will not exist, due to the steer expense of fielding staeship. Some of the considers behind the development of the various types of seaborne ships do not exist in space travel. That being said, at its heart, a hard-science cruiser would a vessel developed to be equal in all parts of armor, armament, engines, Delta-V, and was about to operate independently...and that will be an asset to any future space force. I believe that there will be an hard-science cruiser space warship of some type.
The Sad Story of Two Ambassador class starships, the Enterprise-C and FASA...
How does this relate to the existence of two Ambassador class ships and two Enterprise-Cs? With the success of the STSTCM, and the limited number of canon ships, FASA was forced to design and field their own starships to keep the game interesting and dynamic. This created somewhat a conflict in the minds of most fans...there was the official Paramount canon, then the events shown in the DC Comics, and then the FASA events. For the most part, Paramount ignored FASA's RPG universe until 1987 when the long awaited ST:TNG TV series came to reality. It was believed by Paramount at the time, that all of the different Trek universes were breeding confusion among fans, and the company wanted ST:TNG to be the focus of the fandom and their wallets. It was decided that Paramount should tighten the reins on and FASA naturally geared up for product of an TNG-era RPG and ST:STCM game system, with miniatures to match. In 1988 we got glimpse of what those Federation ships could have looked like with the non-canon, but still cool, ST:TNG Officers Manual. This manual attempted to fill in the gaps, and FASA was a company that liked to fill in the blanks, and their take on Trek was no different. They attempted to show what Starfleet had been constructing in the gap between the 23rd century movies and the new 24th century show, and their Ambassador class was a ship that was designed with that era, after the movies, when the Excelsior class was the dominate class of Federation starship.
The name itself was canon by the time of the manual's printing, being established in the 24th episode of TNG, "Conspiracy" (one my favorites!). When the Enterprise-D enters orbit of the Dytallix B moon, one of the starships in orbit is the USS Horatio, which Data identifies as "Ambassador class heavy cruiser", and this gave FASA a name to work with. On page 52, we see FASA's take on the canon Ambassador class heavy cruiser. This vessel was designed to be a fire support element in a taskforce during times of conflict with its long-range phasers and torpedo launchers. Adding to its combat was 100 marine trained in boarding and zero-gee combat, making the Ambassador class prefect for pirate suppression operations in the Triangle region. There is nothing really mentioned about the role of the FASA Ambassador class during peacetime, but it assumed that it would be similar to the Constitution class. People that used the old Ambassador class say that the ship is one of the strongest offensive in the old FASA system.
So, did FASA use their own Ambassador class design for their Enterprise-B? No actually, they gave that honor to an Alaska class battlecrusier, which FASA never made an official drawing for. Some talented people over at starship schematics database made a drawing based on the images seen of the Enterprise-C model on the wall of the conference room of the D. According to page 55 of the Officers Manual, the Alaska class C was protested by the Vulcans, and the ship was lost while on a ten-year exploration mission in the northwest quadrant of the galaxy. Starbase 67 received a distress call, and Starfleet declared the C lost roughly the border of the Gamma Quadrants. Some fans have speculated that the loss of the C was the first contact between the Federation and the Dominion.
The official canonized design of the Ambassador class was presented in the excellent 3rd season episode "Yesterday's Enterprise", and was an attempted by Rick Sternbach to bridge the gap between the two eras in Starfleet, with hallmarks of the future Galaxy class and the Excelsior class. The model was only given a few days to be designed and only few days after that to be constructed. I was never a big fan of the Ambassador design, especially because I had been taught, by FASA, what the this class should look like. This design always felt half-baked to me, and still does, however it has grown on me.
Since its coming out in the 3rd season, the Ambassador class has been since in several episodes, including during the Dominion War. When we examine the fictional Ambassador class, we see a ship in conjunction with the Excelsior class, we attempting to fill the hole left by the retired Constitution class. The Ambassador class explorer/heavy cruiser was launched in 2330's, and the Enterprise-C was destroyed in 2344, just as the initial plans for the Galaxy class was being drawn up. There is little on the class itself, how many were built, and even if they are still being constructed. During the Borg invasion, the Ambassadors serviced and were offensive upgraded during the Dominion War. It is likely that after that war, the Intrepid class finally replaced the Ambassador class.
One of the main reasons why we did not get the game stats or FASA workup on the official Ambassador class or even a 24th century combat game was the Paramount cancelled FASA licence in 1989. The genesis behind this decision has never been made public...however, there are internet rumors. According to some sources online, Gene Roddenberry was pissed about the growing militarization of Star Trek via FASA and their players. He and the studio, at the time, were attempting to bring fans over to the new TV show and re-focus the Trek universe to one of exploration, and not military conflict.
Paramount did some of this via freezing out of FASA after TNG hit the air-waves, but the relationship died once Gene Roddenberry and others at the studio learned of FASA's future plans for their vision of Trek....massive war-games focused on both planetary ground forces and galactic-size war.. Roddenberry as stated many times that Trek is not about conflict, but exploration, and the idea of FASA publishing a strategic tabletop war game with one the possibility for the players was for the Federation to invade the Klingon and Romulan Empires disgusted him. Roddenberry lend on Paramount, and in turn, Paramount lend on FASA. By 1989, FASA's Trek RPG was over, and contrary to popular belief this was not the reason that FASA folded up shop in 2001. In truth, FASA's bread-&-butter was Battletech, Trek hadn't been as successful as FASA had hoped, and the only moneymaker of the line, the combat games which was the forbidden fruit by Paramount's standards. Today, the old FASA Trek universe is mostly forgotten, save for us few that remember the 1980's...geek rant over.
Examples:
The Narn Regime G'Quan class Heavy Cruiser from Babylon 5
Given that this Narn warship is named for their main religious figure tells you something about the importance of this warship to the Narn Regime. The bulk of the Narn fleet is composed (or what was seen on the show) of this single type of warship, much like the Omega class destroyer or the Sharlin class warship, and the Centauri Primus class warship of the other major races. From 2109 to 2210, the Narn were subjugated by the Centauri Republic, and upon liberation, the Narn reverse-engineered Centrauri technology. The G'Quan was one of the results of this project, and ranks close in technology to Earth-Force warships and both painfully behind the older races.
The set-piece of TV show Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda, was the Andromeda Ascent heavy cruiser, both the ship and her captain were refugees to a different time and situation. Around the year 9768 of the Systems Commonwealth, the High Guard fleet began to construct the Glorious Heritage class of heavy cruisers, and would become one of the symbols of the High Guard and the Restored Systems Commonwealth. After the fall of the Systems Commonwealth due to the attack by the Nietzschean clans, much of the High Guard fleet was destroyed...however, the Andromeda survived. As seen in the show, the Andromeda was the most advanced warship in the three galaxies, armed with both defensive and offensive armaments, like combat drones, point defense lasers, anti-proton cannons, kinetic kill missiles, and a very intelligent A.I. system. Unlike most Star Trek ships, the heavy cruisers of the Andromeda universe were armed with a variety of choices for different tactical conditions, including a small group of attack fingers and 800 Lancer group troops.
The Federation Nebula class Heavy Cruiser
To most fans, official Federation starships come at a painfully pace. Despite all of the video games, TV series, and movies, there are only a dozen or so canon classes of starships. During the fourth season of ST:TNG, we finally got a look at what Starfleet was building in the 24th century. For much of that series, TNG recycled older 23rd century movies Federation ships, like the Excelsior class and Grissom class. It wasn't until the 86th episode of that series, aired in 1991, that we finally got a semi-new Federation starship in "The Wounded". That ship was the USS Phoenix of the Nebula class. There had been a kitbashed Nebula class seen in the Wolf 359 Graveyard during "The Best of Both Worlds Part II" aired in 1990, but the model was improved for "The Wounded". The Nebula class was designed by Michael Okuda and Rick Sternbach, with the model was built by Greg Jein, and heavily borrowed from Andy Probert's design for the Enterprise-D.
The Earth Force Hyperion class Heavy Cruiser from Babylon 5
Before the iconic Omega and Warlock class warships, Earth's frontline warship and symbol of Earth-Dome's power was the Hyperion heavy cruiser. This vessel would roll out of spacedocks in 2226, and be fitted with the latest technology of the day, including Earth's first jump-point generators. The Hyperion class represented the standard technology of the Earth-Force prior to the Shadow War, and unlike the Omega class, the Hyperion lacked gravity sections. This was the first class of warship by Earth to have jumpgate technology, and served in Dilgar War in 2230 These vessel would be the vanguard of the Earth-Force military contingent to the League of Non-Aligned Worlds during the Dilgar War of 2230-2232. This ship would also be there at the very beginning of the Earth-Minbari War in 2245.
While these ships served with honor throughout the Earth-Minbari War, one of her own was responbile for the intital attack that lead to humanity's costly war. The EAS Prometheus was the taskforce led vessel sent to make contact with the Minbari Federation, with Captain Michael Jankowski in charge. He misinterpreted the approaching Minbari warship for hostile attend, and opened fire, destroying the vessel, and dooming both societies to a long war.
After the Eath-Minbari War, the Omega class would become the main warship for the fleet, however, the Hyperion class would be upgraded to serve until the liberation of Earth, when it was replaced by the newer generation of Earth-Force warships that benefited from new technologies.
These Hyperion class saw a major upgrade in offensive and defensive armament to bridge the gap in Clarke's fleet that were created by desertion Earth-Force units.Despite these offensive upgrades, the older design and hull were not match for even the Omega class, as seen in face-off between the EAS Clarkstown and the EAS Alexander around Orion III. This era of Hyperion class heavy cruisers came in at over one thousand meters, with six Starfury fighters, and was about to operate a year away from supply-lines. Offensive, the Hyperion was armed with two 52mm pulse-plasma cannons, two 40mm pulse plasma cannons, two particle cannons, four pulse discharge cannons, and two nuclear missile tubes. Defensively, there were six Starfury fighters, four pulse discharge cannons acting as interceptors, and 6-8 meter thick armor. The Hyperion was original designed by Founding Imaging Ron Thornton on a napkin, and was finished out by Mark Kochinski. The name of the class came from one of the 12 Greek Titans.
The Federation Constitution class Heavy Cruiser
The Constitution class was first launched around 2245, with the goal of being the long-range explorer vessel for Starfleet that was also armed enough to be classified as an "heavy cruiser" in times of war. Contrary to popular opinion, the name of the class was not derived from the American Constitution but rather the Federation Constitution from 2161. Much like the previous NX and Daedalus classes of ships, the Constitution was designed to be flexible, and a deterrent to the enemies of the Federation: the Gorn, Orion pirates, the Klingon and Romulan empires. By the 2260's, thirteen of the class were in service with the fleet, and were the symbols of the Federation. By the time Captain Kirk was given command of the Enterprise in 2265, his ship had been refitted twice. During the 2260's, the Constitution class served the Federation on long-duration space exploration missions, that resulted in a few being lost.
In the 2270's, the bulk of the Constitution class were extensive refitted and expanded over a process that took over a year. With this refit, the Constitution II class or sometimes referred as the Enterprise class, was once again the main arm of Starfleet. It is also during this period that Starfleet constructed more of the iconic starship, but also was exploring a replacement starship, the NX-2000 Excelsior. Each of these refit Constitution II class heavy cruisers were different, based on the contractors, the spacedock site, and equipment available. This It should be noted that it took two classes of ships to fulfill the dual roles of the Constitution class.
From the 2270's to the 2290's, the Excelsior class along with and Constellation class was slowly taking over the roles of the grand old lady of the fleet, and as the Constitution class need service, these vessels were being mothballed instead of being refit.A few were kept in service for use as a Academy training vessels, and the Enterprise-A was preserved at the Starfleet museum. However, this was not the end of the story of the Constitution. During the Borg Emergency of the 2367 and the resulting Battle of Wolf 359, several Constitution class vessels were dug out of the mothball fleet, and deployed. This was true during the bloody Dominion War. Starfleet was desperate for combat ships, and dipped into the mothball fleet and ships under construction. These vessels were a Frankenstein of different types of starships fitted together with up-to-date weaponry. After the war ended, these ships were struck back to their original pieces. Given the impact and legacy of the Enterprise and Constitution class, Starfleet borrowed from the design for other design. The Ambassador heavy cruiser was patterned after the Constitution class, along with the 24th century badass Sovereign class.
The Federation Belknap class Heavy Cruiser from Star Trek
With the limited number of "official" starships in the Star Trek universe, fans, comic companies, and game companies had to turn to designing their own ships, and one of these was the Belknap strike/heavy cruiser of the late 2260's. According to the 1992 Ships of the Starfleet Volume One by Todd Guenther, the Belknap class was developed from the familiar Constitution class. Originally, the Belknap was to be backup starship to the Constitution class and be cheaper than fielding more of Constitution class, Starfleet commander changed their minds about this smaller ship. During the Four Year War with the Klingon Empire, a number of larger perimeter action ships were constructed and fielded. After that war, there was little need for these ships as Starfleet returned to its primary mission of exploration, however given the hostile of the Klingon Empire, Starfleet needed another vessel to fulfill that role if needed, Starfleet turned to the Belknap class. This non-canon vessel was first featured in the DC Comics 1987 Who's Who in Star Trek and seemed like the artist riffed off of the refit Constitution class. There it was called the Decatur class, and later, Todd Guenther used the familiar design for his Belknap class strike crusier, and some fans even put the design through its pacing via the old FASA starship combat system. This ship has been seen from time-to-time in the old DC Star Trek comics.
The Star League Aegis Heavy Cruiser from Battletech
In 1986, FASA took the world of mech combat into the stars, with AeroTech, and was expanded in 1993 with BattleSpace. However, our glimpse of the ships that populated the Battletech universe came with 1989's Technical Readout 2750. On page 132, we get the lowdown on the Aegis class heavy cruiser. According to the text, the Aegis class was fielded into service twice, 2372 and then again in 2582. While the original Aegis served the Terran Hegemony, the refitted Aegis of 2582 served the Star League during the Reunification War, when the need for ships outweigh their age. The power of the Aegis class was the 18 naval autocannons and anti-ship missiles, making this vessel a ship-killer. These vessels were equipped with lithium-fusion batteries and a solar sail to collect energy.
When General Aleksandr Kerensky left the Inner Space with the majority resources, most the Aegis cruisers left with him. These vessels are presently in serve with the Clans, specifically Jade Falcon. In the 31st century, the Aegis serves more in an escort and transport duties. In 1994, FASA gave the spacecraft of the Battletech their own Technical Readout with 3057, and on page 145, we see Aegis, and my...how it has changed, like most of the familiar warships from 2750. The Aegis class looks much different, but the information was carried forward along the armament. The original Aegis heavy cruiser was designed by Dana Knutson, Tom Miller, Michael Weaver, while the 1994 version was designed by Duane Loose.
The Klingon D-7 Heavy Cruiser from Star Trek
Look into my Eye! |
Some Trek sites dispute that all of the D-7s seen on screen are of the same ship class, and could be design similarities, like the D-7 battlecruiser upgrade and the later K't'inga class battlecruiser. Whatever. The truth is that same Klingon warship has been seen on-screen since TOS, and it's design, along with the Bird-of-Prey have become standard symbols of the Klingon people. According to some Trek resources, the D-7 type heavy cruiser has been in service with the empire for over 200 years. This vessel has been seen in every Trek work, from TOS to Enterprise to the films. That is impressive feat for a sci-fi model! On the Ex Astris Scientia article about the D-7, they call it "The Everlasting Klingon Battlecruiser".
The Cardassian Galor class Heavy Cruiser from Star Trek
Before the advent of CGI SFX, TV shows and movies were forced to make models of their futuristic spaceships. Star Trek and Star Wars prided themselves on the quality of their models, but they took time and money. This explains the limited number of ships seen in these works. In the 4th season episode of ST:TNG, "The Wounded", we got two new starships and a new alien race! Along with the Nebula class heavy cruiser, we got the Galor class heavy cruiser, the main warship in the service of the Cardassian Union. Most of the mustard-colored Cardassian warships are based around a similar style, like the Federation, but it is difficult for most to see different between the Galor and Keldon class warships.
Besides the interesting look, the Galor class had their "nacelles" in the shape of blades or wings on the forward section of the ship. When it comes weapons, the Galor class is also interesting. Most ships seen in Trek use a DEW system, like phasers, and a missile system, like photon torpedoes, but not the Cardassians. At the front of the secondary hull, there is massive DEW emitter that is believed to be some sort of disruptor array. On other various hard points on the Galor class are phaser emitters...but no missile system. In terms of the 24th century tactical realities, the Galor class lags behind the Galaxy class and the Klingon Vor'cha class. This causes the Cardassian Union fleet to use packs of Galor class heavy cruisers to overwhelm their targets.
The Tyranid Devourer Heavy Cruiser from WH40K
Here is an weird cruiser for the examples list, a bioship cruiser! According to the Gothic game, the Tyranid used their cruisers to protect the hive ships and secure vessel for culling. Unlike most cruiser mentioned here, these bioships were reliant on their mother ships to provide shelter and food. They attack using projected acid batteries and physical melee attacks with claws. Nasty. This is one of the most interesting cruiser of sci-fi....
The Eldar Eclipse class Attack Cruiser from WH40K
The Eldar combat vessels are more fast and maneuver than the imperial varieties. In addition, the Eclipse class features attack fighters and fighter-bombers give this vessel increased offensive capability in conjunction with their pulsar laser cannons. With all of this elements, the Eclipse class were used as a convey raider, and feared by the Imperial ships operating in the Gothic sector. This is just listed as an "cruiser" in the classification, so I've decided to include it on the heavy cruiser blogpost. This design reminds me of some of the old D&D Spelljammer designs.
The Intrepid class Heavy Cruiser from Star Trek: Voyager
One of the interesting design notes that most likely saved Voyager's life a few times in the Delta Quadrant, was Starfleet's decision to arm this smaller ship to the degree of a Galaxy class! Fitted around these vessels are no less than five phaser emitters, plus four photon launchers. During the bloody Federation/Dominion War. Unlike the majority of Federation starships, the Intrepid class can fly within planetary atmospheres, and even land on-planet, with a set of landing gears and special landing flight mode. To allow take-off, special anti-gravity generators were fitted, along with increased thruster and impulse systems.
One element never shown on-screen was the Runabout sized "Aeroshuttle" fitted under the saucer selection. I first noticed this auxiliary spacecraft on my Playmates Voyager toy (I still own, and sits in the FWS offices even today!), and I wondered at the time I wondered if we would ever see this craft on-screen, and of course, we didn't during the entire run of the show. Some fans have speculated that the Intrepid class is the 24th century equivalent to the 23rd century Constitution class, was intended to become one of the backbone classes of Starfleet with the retirement (and losses) of the old Excelsior class.
If you want to know more about the fictional history of the Intrepid class:
http://fsd.trekships.org/art/intrepid.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)